<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8065674398442428352</id><updated>2011-04-21T18:03:16.461-07:00</updated><category term='Network'/><category term='Cisco'/><category term='Ubuntu'/><category term='Antivirus'/><category term='Symantec'/><category term='Windows 7'/><title type='text'>Adventures in Tech</title><subtitle type='html'></subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://advintech.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8065674398442428352/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://advintech.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Adventures in Tech</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08616772981387543557</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>4</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8065674398442428352.post-8491628941228136032</id><published>2009-01-15T17:43:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-01-15T17:46:20.010-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Powershell  - The Love / Hate Relationship</title><content type='html'>Powershell is Microsoft’s new scripting language and command shell.  It is an Object oriented scripting language.  Most of Microsoft’s products are manageable with it.  It is extremely powerful but has a steep learning curve.  I love what all I can do with it.  It seems like I am learning more every day.  However I have so much to learn about it.  I have been able to do things like get a network inventory of all of our workstations including manufacturer, serial number, logged in user, processor, RAM.  I could go on and on.  I have used the Quest AD cmdlets to add every users phone number to their AD account.  With as great as all of this is I waste so much time trying to get the scripts to work.  Sometimes it would be easier to manually put information into AD instead of scripting it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I will be posting some of my scripts and utilities I use to work with Powershell as I learn. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You can download Powershell version one here:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/technologies/management/powershell/download.mspx"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/technologies/management/powershell/download.mspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8065674398442428352-8491628941228136032?l=advintech.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://advintech.blogspot.com/feeds/8491628941228136032/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8065674398442428352&amp;postID=8491628941228136032' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8065674398442428352/posts/default/8491628941228136032'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8065674398442428352/posts/default/8491628941228136032'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://advintech.blogspot.com/2009/01/powershell-love-hate-relationship.html' title='Powershell  - The Love / Hate Relationship'/><author><name>Adventures in Tech</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08616772981387543557</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8065674398442428352.post-307890067974743705</id><published>2009-01-15T17:24:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-01-15T17:26:25.765-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Symantec'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Antivirus'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Cisco'/><title type='text'>The Quest for New Enterprise Antivirus</title><content type='html'>I am going to moving from Symantec Antivirus at my work.  This has not been an easy decision for me.  I have used Symantec Antivirus for almost for ten years.  I have depended on it and it has not let me down on a large scale.  However version 11 is absolutely horrible.  It takes up a lot of resources and is not easy to configure.  Symantec has moved from a traditional Antivirus to a security agent that has Antivirus, Firewall, Intrusion detection, and client security.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am going to looking at Sophos Antivirus and Kaspersky Antivirus.  I am told that both have an enterprise solution.  I have no experience with either software.  I will also be looking at Cisco Security Agent.  I know that it is a completely different approach.  With Cisco Security Agent you have a list of trusted application and can block all the others.  That is a very simple explanation.  From what I can understand there are a lot more details. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As I learn more about each product I will be blogging about them.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8065674398442428352-307890067974743705?l=advintech.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://advintech.blogspot.com/feeds/307890067974743705/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8065674398442428352&amp;postID=307890067974743705' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8065674398442428352/posts/default/307890067974743705'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8065674398442428352/posts/default/307890067974743705'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://advintech.blogspot.com/2009/01/quest-for-new-enterprise-antivirus.html' title='The Quest for New Enterprise Antivirus'/><author><name>Adventures in Tech</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08616772981387543557</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8065674398442428352.post-1001277389537729597</id><published>2009-01-15T06:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-01-15T06:10:21.219-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Windows 7'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Ubuntu'/><title type='text'>Ubuntu 9.04 Vs. Windows7 Boot time</title><content type='html'>Softpedia has a story about Ubuntu 9.04 booting in 21 seconds.  It is counting from the time the Grub boot loader appears until the logon manager appears.   I thought it would be good to compare on Windows7.  I have a Lenovo T60p that is a member of a domain.  From the time the Lenovo BIOS disappears until the "Press CTRL + ALT + DELETE to log" on appears is 37 seconds.  Has anyone tested this on a Windows 7 computer that is not a member of a domain?  If so please let me know.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here is the link for the Ubuntu story.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.softpedia.com/news/Ubuntu-9-04-Boots-in-21-4-Seconds-101885.shtml"&gt;http://news.softpedia.com/news/Ubuntu-9-04-Boots-in-21-4-Seconds-101885.shtml&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8065674398442428352-1001277389537729597?l=advintech.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://advintech.blogspot.com/feeds/1001277389537729597/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8065674398442428352&amp;postID=1001277389537729597' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8065674398442428352/posts/default/1001277389537729597'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8065674398442428352/posts/default/1001277389537729597'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://advintech.blogspot.com/2009/01/ubuntu-904-vs-windows7-boot-time.html' title='Ubuntu 9.04 Vs. Windows7 Boot time'/><author><name>Adventures in Tech</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08616772981387543557</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8065674398442428352.post-4095686703184358</id><published>2009-01-14T08:59:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-01-14T11:31:57.617-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Network'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Windows 7'/><title type='text'>Windows 7 Beta Network Performance</title><content type='html'>One of my major complaints about Vista has been the network performance problems, or atleast what seemed to be network performance problems. I worked with a couple of guys at work on testing network performance with XP, Vista and Windows 7 Beta. We created following script to test with.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;net use N: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="file://servername/C$/Test"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;file://servername/C$/Test&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;mkdir ST&lt;br /&gt;echo Start,%time% &gt;&gt; Results.csv&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;copy N:\ReportViewer.exe ST\RV.exe&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;echo Small,%time% &gt;&gt; Results.csv&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;copy N:\office2007sp1-kb936982-fullfile-en-us.exe ST\of.exe&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;echo Big,%time% &gt;&gt; Results.csv&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;echo F1,=B2-B1 &gt;&gt; Results.csv&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;echo F2,=B3-B2 &gt;&gt; Results.csv&lt;br /&gt;del ST\RV.exe&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;del ST\OF.exe&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;rmdir ST&lt;br /&gt;net use /delete N: /y&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;I used a Windows 2003 Server and a Windows 2008 Server for testing. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;Here are the results:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5291233996510531490" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 400px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 169px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_urCokQ8FYR0/SW49SSF7D6I/AAAAAAAAAYE/2C9S5LZFCeQ/s400/SNAG_Program-0001.png" border="0" /&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;I was shocked by the performance of Windows 7 downloading from Windows 2003 server. I hope that Microsoft works on this. Remember that this is a Beta and we will have to wait until RTM to determine the real performance. I am very impressed with the perfromance of Windows 7 and Windows 2008 server. Hopefully this does not change in the RTM.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8065674398442428352-4095686703184358?l=advintech.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://advintech.blogspot.com/feeds/4095686703184358/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8065674398442428352&amp;postID=4095686703184358' title='7 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8065674398442428352/posts/default/4095686703184358'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8065674398442428352/posts/default/4095686703184358'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://advintech.blogspot.com/2009/01/windows-7-beta-network-performance.html' title='Windows 7 Beta Network Performance'/><author><name>Adventures in Tech</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08616772981387543557</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_urCokQ8FYR0/SW49SSF7D6I/AAAAAAAAAYE/2C9S5LZFCeQ/s72-c/SNAG_Program-0001.png' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>7</thr:total></entry></feed>
